> I couldn't say for sure what a safe level of queries would be. If I were
> to guess, I'd say somewhere under 20,000 per 24 hour period.

Speaking for dnswl.org, we consider sites[*] with > 100k queries per 24
hour as "heavy users" who should rsync our data and run a local mirror.
20k will only show on the third or fourth page of the report which we
hardly ever look at.

A local mirror for net mass-checks may make sense for speed and
reliability reasons; rsync access for dnswl.org is free. Since our data is
rather small (at least when compared to a typical blocklist), it can also
be handled as a BIND zone file (ie no rbldnsd is required, which makes
handling local zones a bit easier).

[*] We consider both individual querying IP addresses and the sum from
queries from /24s.

-- Matthias


Reply via email to