http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5780
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-17 13:37 ------- (in reply to comment#3) I guess the answer to that question depends on the relative cost of a false positive versus a false negative in the URI detection. When the URI is used to get a host name for an RBL lookup, we would probably prefer to get false positive junk that doesn't appear in the RBL instead of missing any evil host names. But for a rule such as WEIRD_PORT, the tradeoff is the opposite. Perhaps the answer is to find a way to keep the extraction of host names for RBL lookups liberal, but make rules that use the full URL be stricter. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
