http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5780
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-17 14:11 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Perhaps the answer is to find a way to keep the extraction of host names > > for RBL > > lookups liberal, but make rules that use the full URL be stricter. > > FWIW, we have some of this by the uri_detail data. At least, we can tell if the URL came from a HTML > tag (and which one) versus being parsed out of the text/plain, or both. It doesn't track being parsed w/ > protocol versus "likely domain", etc. > > uri_detail is already used in the URIDNSBL plugin, for example, to give a different lookup priority to > parsed domains versus HTML referenced domains. +1 to making WIERD_PORT stricter so that it doesn't FP in this case. if there's any changes made to the URI extraction algorithms, let's ensure we come up with a set of test cases that it both should, and shouldn't extract; test-driven development is the way to do this IMO. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
