https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5902
--- Comment #2 from Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-07 15:46:21 PST ---
This is actually the second time recently I have received spam from a
habeas-accredited sender, and habeas did not reply to my complaint. What is
the procedure within spamassassin for evaluating whether habeas's
accreditations continue to be valid?
eturn-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on linuxpal.mit.edu
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=3.7 required=1.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_99,
DATE_IN_PAST_24_48,HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04,HTML_MESSA\
GE,
MIME_HTML_ONLY,URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no version=3.2.4
X-Spam-Report:
* 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 1.0000]
* 1.2 DATE_IN_PAST_24_48 Date: is 24 to 48 hours before Received: date
* 0.2 HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04 BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to image
\
area
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* 1.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
* -4.3 HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI RBL: Habeas Accredited Opt-In or Better
* [63.149.233.41 listed in sa-accredit.habeas.com]
* 2.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
* [URIs: solutionlists.com]
* 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from Outbound-Two.nuos.com (outbound-two.nuos.com [63.149.233.41])
by linuxpal.mit.edu (Postfix) with SMTP id DCC5116E33
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:04:50 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-EM-Version: 5, 0, 0, 4
X-EM-Registration: #01E0530610F50E00AC00
From: "IT Solution Journal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "GREGORY TROXEL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Introducing CDW Days of Savings
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:14:05 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=US-ASCII
and the unanswered complaint:
From: Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: spam labeled as optin by habeas
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 09:32:12 -0400
habeas:
I received the following spam, and have never had anything to do with
solutionlist. Please explain what's going on - is this new bad behavior
from an accredited sender, or should I file a bug with spamassassin to
remove the rule giving negative points for HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
