https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6155
--- Comment #151 from Warren Togami <[email protected]> 2009-11-07 15:46:54 UTC --- Please manually adjust the scores of RCVD_IN_PSBL up. At the time of the rescore masscheck PSBL had not yet whitelisted hotmail, yahoo, gmail and a number of major ISP's. As a result, for 5 weeks straight RCVD_IN_PSBL has been almost completely devoid of FP's in our weekly masschecks. I am confident that PSBL performs safer than measured during the rescore masscheck. http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20090829-r809102-n/RCVD_IN_PSBL/detail http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20090905-r811608-n/RCVD_IN_PSBL/detail http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20090912-r814117-n/RCVD_IN_PSBL/detail http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20090919-r816871-n/RCVD_IN_PSBL/detail http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20090926-r819101-n/RCVD_IN_PSBL/detail http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091003-r821273-n/RCVD_IN_PSBL/detail (below this point FP rate dropped to nearly zero) http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091010-r823821-n/RCVD_IN_PSBL/detail http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091017-r826198-n/RCVD_IN_PSBL/detail http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091024-r829323-n/RCVD_IN_PSBL/detail http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091031-r831520-n/RCVD_IN_PSBL/detail http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091107-r833654-n/RCVD_IN_PSBL/detail You can plainly see steady and sustained improvement in FP safety in these past weeks. RCVD_IN_PSBL in the rescore masscheck was without lastexternal. Clearly with the added limitation of lastexternal it is safer than measured. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
