On 01/15/2010 11:13 AM, Warren Togami wrote:
-1 Even though my rc3 was unofficial, it is entirely uncool from packager perspective to reuse names. Names are meaningless and cheap. This should have been named rc4. Furthermore I am unconvinced that we should change the "use bytes" thing at this last minute. It has been going on since early 3.2.x and we're fixing it only at the last moment before 3.3.0? This seems unsafe. Could someone provide a sample message that takes an obscene amount of time? Warren
Furthermore, what is releasing an official rc3 at this point going to gain us, especially if it will take 3 days to become an official release?
Warren
