On 01/20/2010 06:29 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Another thing I noticed, comparing the resulting rules from network sa-update to rules installed from a tarball is the inclusion of two 'nopublish' rules in the tarball. As these are both meta rules, this should not be a blocker.
How did these nopublish rules get into the sa-update channel? This seems to be a bug. These rules will cause network lookups to that provider who is unprepared for the 3.3.0 release onslaught. He's currently working on moving the zone to a separate address with public mirrors and round robin DNS.
Warren Togami [email protected]
