On 01/20/2010 11:37 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
How did these nopublish rules get into the sa-update channel? This
seems to be a bug. These rules will cause network lookups to that
provider who is unprepared for the 3.3.0 release onslaught. He's
currently working on moving the zone to a separate address with public
mirrors and round robin DNS.
Warren Togami
[email protected]
They got in the tarball/update channel because they shouldn't have. It's
a bug but this confirms the belief that the relevant bug 6297 should be
a blocker for 3.3.0.
However, I don't know for sure that it ever went out to the sa-update
channel. It's in the proposed 3.3.0 release rules tarball (and therefore
the proposed 3.3.0 channel).
Regards,
KAM
Recut happening today? That should give us a good amount of non-weekend
days to validate the new cut and the release will be closer to the
Tuesday press release.
Warren
