On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 16:53, Warren Togami <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/20/2010 11:37 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >>> >>> How did these nopublish rules get into the sa-update channel? This >>> seems to be a bug. These rules will cause network lookups to that >>> provider who is unprepared for the 3.3.0 release onslaught. He's >>> currently working on moving the zone to a separate address with public >>> mirrors and round robin DNS. >>> >>> Warren Togami >>> [email protected] >> >> They got in the tarball/update channel because they shouldn't have. It's >> a bug but this confirms the belief that the relevant bug 6297 should be >> a blocker for 3.3.0. >> >> However, I don't know for sure that it ever went out to the sa-update >> channel. It's in the proposed 3.3.0 release rules tarball (and therefore >> the proposed 3.3.0 channel). >> >> Regards, >> KAM > > Recut happening today? That should give us a good amount of non-weekend > days to validate the new cut and the release will be closer to the Tuesday > press release.
not until we fix that bug first ;) -- --j.
