https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6085
[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] | |.org --- Comment #3 from [email protected] 2010-08-16 03:55:55 UTC --- I am for the idea in concept (and actually do report "excessively spammy" messages to Knujon), but modifying SA to do this directly may not be the best way to do it, nor is it how I do it. If the SA community does wish to modify SA to do this directly, then I suggest that it allow an adminstrator to specify a [LOCAL] virtual mailbox with which to deliver the spam. That mailbox may be expanded or aliased (e.g. sendmail's aliases file, or via mailing list software) to deliver to more than one spam collecting service. The above is what I do at my system. I call SA via the MIMEDefang package using the latter's "filter_end()" hook. Depending on the actual score SA reports, I progressively add more reporting-service mailboxes via the "add_recipient()" function. Knujon's mailbox is one of those aliased to one of 4 levels of reporting, including a routine that looks up the envelope sender's domain at "abuse.net" to retrieve the abuse mailboxes. (Either there was no SPF or DK/DKIM records, or those records passed in order to get this far -- so I'm either reporting spam that has NOT been forged, or spam where the domain used doesn't care to protect itself against forgery.) NONE of this requires any modification to SpamAssassin, so modification is technically unnecessary. Therefore, if I had a "vote" in the matter, I vote NO. This can be done without modification to SA -- and let's keep SA simple and efficient. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
