https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6085
Giampaolo Tomassoni <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #4 from Giampaolo Tomassoni <[email protected]> 2010-08-16 04:48:58 UTC --- Is there any difference in reporting to KnujOn with respect to SpamCop? I mean, differences in the reporting algorithms/protocols, not in the net effects. DCC, Pyzor and Razor report message hashes to their own engines. These hashes are computed and reported in different ways, so that it is reasonable to me they have their own report handling methods. The SpamCop plugin instead envelopes and ships the first spamcop_max_report_size kbytes of the reported message to a specified mailbox address. This plugin is actually used only for reporting. So, isn't it suitable for reporting to KnujOn, too? If yes, wouldn't it be better to renate/alias the SpamCop plugin with a more general way, instead of adding yet another message reporting plugin? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
