https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6525
--- Comment #2 from Warren Togami <[email protected]> 2010-12-26 02:42:41 UTC --- What does "a lot" mean? My own logs for the past few months show 1.2% hit rate on NJABL*. The masschecks seem to indicate a similarly low hit rate on NJABL* and a relatively high FP rate. http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=DNSBL%20Usage This page seems to indicate that NJABL is now redundant, incorporated as part of Spamhaus. Redundant is bad. In any case, if we were considering NJABL as a new DNSBL in spamassassin today it wouldn't even come close to being acceptable. Given its very low performance, it wouldn't effect us much at all to simply turn it off. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
