https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6525
--- Comment #4 from Warren Togami <[email protected]> 2010-12-26 02:57:33 UTC --- > Do you have a new RH/Fedora release coming up? No. I don't work there anymore. I'm just trying to improve spamassassin. In any case, NJABL is by far the worst performing of our default DNSBL's. While it is catching something, it is not anywhere near enough to make it worthwhile to keep enabled. >> http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=DNSBL%20Usage >> This page seems to indicate that NJABL is now redundant, incorporated as part >> of Spamhaus. Redundant is bad. > Not all. > NJBL's Dynablock is included. And some of the bot related data. OK, which return code is dynablock? Can we hit only on that, if that is the non-reduction portion of NJABL? Oh wait, even then the hit rate is too insignificant to make keeping NJABL worthwhile. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
