https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6525
--- Comment #3 from AXB <[email protected]> 2010-12-26 02:48:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > What does "a lot" mean? > > My own logs for the past few months show 1.2% hit rate on NJABL*. The > masschecks seem to indicate a similarly low hit rate on NJABL* and a > relatively > high FP rate. > > http://www.spamhaus.org/faq/answers.lasso?section=DNSBL%20Usage > This page seems to indicate that NJABL is now redundant, incorporated as part > of Spamhaus. Redundant is bad. Not all. NJBL's Dynablock is included. And some of the bot related data. > In any case, if we were considering NJABL as a new DNSBL in spamassassin today > it wouldn't even come close to being acceptable. Given its very low > performance, it wouldn't effect us much at all to simply turn it off. Do you have a new RH/Fedora release coming up? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
