https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6525
--- Comment #13 from AXB <[email protected]> 2010-12-26 04:30:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Thank you. > > It seems your own numbers agree that it is an extremely low hit-rate. > > I don't dispute that it might add "extra confidence" in overlaps, but I still > strongly suggest that the negligible benefit of NJABL is not worth the cost. > If we were considering the worthiness of adding NJABL today it wouldn't make > it. > NJABL's rare hits this past month on my server is overlapping other rules to > such an extent that the average spam score is 30+. Meanwhile, I see a > relatively large amount of FP's to this tiny amount of spam hits. Lets see what other have to say to this: as said I'm 100% -1 towards removing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
