https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6537
--- Comment #4 from Karsten Bräckelmann <[email protected]> 2011-01-26 19:35:50 EST --- As I mentioned someplace else, SA is not the only user of URIBLs. Milters are too, and in the list is plenty of evidence for that -- URIs SA never would have queried for. Rather than manually working on a list to add, and do it again later, and again... here's a (possibly crack) idea. How hard would it be for SURBL (or URIBL) to generate such a list periodically? Maybe on a monthly basis, maybe 6 months. Whatever. I guess it should not be too hard to write a script, that *automatically* generates a fresh list, to be included in new releases and even updates. Given a history, the script could add raising URIs, and (eventually) would drop fading out URIs, that have been below a certain threshold for N iterations. That way, there is no need for manual work later. There will be no need for bugs like this. And, given URIs will drop off eventually, the list will not only grow, but include those that actually DO cause queries for the mirrors. Yes, I would volunteer to write that script... -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
