https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6537
--- Comment #9 from AXB <[email protected]> 2011-05-03 06:32:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > > IMO uridnsbl_skip_domain list should be treated as a whitelist and move to > > a > > dedicated file. > > Updates should be pushed via a dedicated SA channel as not everyone > > requires or > > wishes to be ruled as to what they can query or not. > > The list should contain stuff like facebook.com, where there is never any > productive reason to query it. Thus I continue to be puzzled by this desire > to > remove the entire skip list from the default rules. In reality, how many > people will ever need this? you are right BUT: as there is no "unskip" feature built into uridnsbl_skip_domain, it's not user reversible so you impose you choice on ppl. SA is a framework and not our personal I object to any whitelistings unless they are are reversible by a user. > I feel that this resistance is not productive. not relevant. IMO, SA should remain a framework which gives users options based on scoring. uridnsbl_skip_domain doesn't offer this. As soon as someone includes a switch to reverse this, I'm 100% +1 to any additions to your list. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
