https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6537
--- Comment #5 from Warren Togami <[email protected]> 2011-01-26 22:14:08 EST --- > As I mentioned someplace else, SA is not the only user of URIBLs. Milters are > too, and in the list is plenty of evidence for that -- URIs SA never would > have > queried for. > How hard would it be for SURBL (or URIBL) to generate such a list > periodically? > Maybe on a monthly basis, maybe 6 months. Whatever. I agree this is a good idea, but the existing skip list in spamassassin might be causing significant bias in the hit frequencies. It might even be the majority of the SURBL users? Are the milters really operating without their own skip lists? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
