On 03/06, John Hardin wrote: > My corpora include messages from several different mail paths, and > all of my corpora masschecks are done against uploaded corpora on > the SA/Apache servers. How are we to provide trusted_networks data > in that scenario? > > (That's something I've been mildly curious about in the past - how > the heck does the uploaded masscheck _deal_ with setting > trusted_networks etc. for multiple disjoint corpora?)
Maybe it doesn't, and that's enough reason to not use the corpora upload option, and instead run mass-check yourself with trusted_networks defined in spamassassin/user_prefs? > >Should mailing list servers all be listed as trusted_networks? > > As "trusted" means "does not forge headers", I'd say yes. > > >Or should spam from a mailing list be counted against the list server in > >DNSWL? > > Sure, it's spam. Do you want to whitelist a listserv that's relaying spam? Well, we whitelist servers which have been set up to forward all mail, which are forwarding spam. And I'm not sure if that's different enough from a mailing list, which we've effectively asked to send us everything posted to the mailing list. And I think we should do one or the other, not both. Either include all mailing list servers in trusted_networks *or* count spam from a mailing list against the mailing list server. -- "Anarchy is based on the observation that since few are fit to rule themselves, even fewer are fit to rule others." -Edward Abbey http://www.ChaosReigns.com
