On 03/07, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Karsten Bräckelmann, > > Am 2011-03-07 18:44:07, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > > You have a track record of going ballistic on the users list over spam > > waves every once in a while, which more than once [1] turned out to be a > > problem with a single, DNSWL listed Debian server. Once the diagnosis is > > to extend your trusted networks, you become unresponsive and outright > > ignore the suggestion. > > It was NOT Debian. > > I have gotten tonns of spam from DNSWL_*_MED something which have goten > a much to high negative score and gone trough.
Like that last one, which was very clearly from Debian's mailing list server? On 02/21, Michelle Konzack wrote: > 2.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, > medium > trust > [82.195.75.100 listed in list.dnswl.org] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ $ host 82.195.75.100 100.75.195.82.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 100.64/26.75.195.82.in-addr.arpa. 100.64/26.75.195.82.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer liszt.debian.org. ^^^^^^^^^^ With headers that included: X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/8989 List-Id: <debian-mips.lists.debian.org> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/201102.mbox/%3C20110221125434.GI4390@michelle1%3E > > As long a you insist to keep your broken setup, and complain to us about > > obviously un-moderated Debian lists or forwarder addresses, any > > Debian IS NOT THE PROBLEM because I get only arround 100 spams per month > from 96 mailinglists in total. I don't understand your logic here. Can you please try adding the IP address for the debian mailing list server to your trusted_networks? 82.195.75.100. Or tell me why you don't want to?
