On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 17:06 -0500, [email protected] wrote:
> On 03/06, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > 0.3363 bb-guenther_fraud
> > I just checked mine -- sure enough, yes, they ARE spam.
>
> I'm not questioning whether or not they're spam, I'm questioning if the
> right IP address is being fed to DNSWL and all other DNS white and black
> lists.
Did you actually read my full reply?
> Is it the entity actually sending the spam, or is it something that should
> be in your trusted_networks?
According to my original, receiving-time DNSWL results, all of them are
correct. These are being mass-checked on the server (again, they are
actually intended for the Sought Fraud rule-set, which exclusively uses
the body), though the set with initial DNSWL hits are not forwarded.
Scam. Usually cracked accounts. Yes, that DOES occur for DNSWL listed
outgoing SMTP servers, too.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
