https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6400
--- Comment #13 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-11-30 15:58:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > > So Warren should remove the "nopublish" flag, and [...] > > > > Unfortunately, no. Since this is targeted at 3.4 things are much more > > complicate. > > Well, with rules, any change is going to affect all 3.3.* releases as soon as > there's another rule update, right? > > We really do not want to introduce new DNS lookups in an existing branch, > > but > > strictly with the next major/minor release only and a clear announcement in > > the > > release notes. > > Wait, you want to *never* include mailspike in the existing 3.3.* releases, > and > create a separate rule set for 3.4.*? Because of increasing the network load > by 1 DNS lookup, for a very useful looking RBL? That sounds... not good. How > can you justify that? Let's just make the rules 3.4 only and add it to the README. I want to get 3.4.0 out the damn door and I'm working like a slave on IPv6 stuff still to see if we can get it finalized. I believe we can just encapsulate it in a version check. if (version >= 3.400000) ... endif Copacetic if we do that? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
