https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6724
--- Comment #21 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2011-12-13 21:47:24 UTC --- > Matthias, if you can decide on a bit (not a bitmask) to return for DNSWL > blocks, we can add the notification rule. Based on KB's notes, 255 is acceptable for DNSWL because it's not implemented with a bitmask. > And if this moves you to change your decision to implement the purposefully > wrong DNS response, we can move DNSWL back to default configuration. > > Then we'll keep the ticket open and perhaps someone can work on a way to make > spamd recognize that the BLOCK rule is triggered and hold off on subsequent > DNSBL queries for 1 hour. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
