$ dpkg -L spamassassin | grep pre | xargs grep WLBLEva
/etc/spamassassin/v320.pre:loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::WLBLEval
Run spamassassin -t rp_test.txt on the attached file. Do you get an
RP_MATCHES_RCVD hit? I've personally confirmed it does on 3.3.2 and trunk.
From [email protected] Thu Dec 22
12:20:08 2011
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
by intel1.peregrinehw.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id pBMHK6XI026664
for <[email protected]>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:20:07 -0500
Received: (qmail 98834 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2011 17:20:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact [email protected]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:[email protected]>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Id: <dev.spamassassin.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list [email protected]
Received: (qmail 98827 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2011 17:20:05 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:20:05 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
tests=SPF_PASS
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of [email protected]
designates 64.71.152.40 as permitted sender)
Received: from [64.71.152.40] (HELO panic.chaosreigns.com) (64.71.152.40)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:20:01 +0000
Received: by panic.chaosreigns.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 241F42C6BE7; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:19:41 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:19:41 -0500
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: No RP_MATCHES_RCVD at reception time, lots in masscheck
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-KAM-Reverse: Passed - Reverse DNS of hermes.apache.org/140.211.11.3
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 38.124.232.10
On 12/22, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> >>Do you have WLBLEval enabled?
> >Not explicitly. Is that necessary if the debug output says it's loading?
> Just trying to figure out why the rule might not be hitting for you.
>
> If you don't have loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::WLBLEval in
> one of your pre's, you likely have it disabled.
>
> It's in v320.pre, I believe.
$ dpkg -L spamassassin | grep pre | xargs grep WLBLEva
/etc/spamassassin/v320.pre:loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::WLBLEval
Yup.
--
"Life is but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts and frets his
hour upon the stage--and then is heard no more. It is a tale told by an
idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." - William Shakespeare
http://www.ChaosReigns.com
