https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6939
--- Comment #21 from Kip <[email protected]> --- Kevi(In reply to Kevin A. McGrail from comment #20) > Kip, you have much to learn about effective discussions to achieve your > means and insulting our team is not going to get your patch done any faster. > This is a VERY low priority issue because it is improper usage. I will look > at your patch to see if it has some merit. > > It's very likely that the exit code of 64 is expected and documented and > your patch is adding unnecessary output to a product intended to be > daemonized. > > Regards, > KAM Kevin, if you want to lecture me in fatherly tones, that's fine. Everything you're accusing me of your buddy was doing. In any case, I'm really not here for that, but to fix a bug. If you're not interested in that, that's fine and we can solve the problem via a downstream patch. If your buddy feels that disabling someone's account because they lost an argument is the best way to solve a problem a patch has been provided for, then go for it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
