https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6939
--- Comment #30 from Kip <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Karsten Bräckelmann from comment #29) > Anyway, while the patch adds some really fine-grained testing and logging of > differentiated explicit error messages, the real issue is not fixed by it. > Evolution will still fail to filter spam using SA, because it still does not > provide the correct socket, where its own per-user spamd is listening. That depends how you want to frame the issue. For you, it's an issue with Evolution's invocation of SA. For me, it's that, in addition to another issue in spamc's poor error control making the former not evident to most people who experience this same problem. I've also added some additional check to ensure that the socket path, if a non-empty string is provided is sane in a portable manner. > Now that we know the -U socket argument is passed as empty string by > Evolution, that's what to report to GNOME bugzilla (assuming this isn't an > Ubuntu custom patch). And that will come too, but both parties need to take responsibility for their respective issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
