https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6939
--- Comment #33 from Kip <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Karsten Bräckelmann from comment #32) > spamc returns an error indicating exit code. It is the calling process's > responsibility to check this. You're missing the point. We are both in agreement about this. The point is that Evolutions' devs are as fallible as SA's. Evolution isn't checking the return as it should and that's a problem. The other problem is that this former problem could occur with any mail client or other tool that uses SA and the devs could have made the same mistake - and that it could be identified and rectified faster with the patch I've already supplied. It is definitely half a bug in SA because there is no reason for the connect() call to rely on an empty string since that doesn't have any meaningful semantics in this context. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
