https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6939
--- Comment #79 from Kip <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Karsten Bräckelmann from comment #78) > An empty string as a parameter (argument) to an option requiring an > argument, is an entirely valid case. No, you're mistaken in the general sense. That depends entirely on what a program is intended to do with it. But regardless, even in the context of spamc, it's still wrong as I've already demonstrated. > Wrong. STDIN needs to be accessed, to decide whether to contact spamd at > all. See comment 38 for the max-size option you outright dismissed before. > However, this is entirely irrelevant. Wrong again. spamc calls read_args()'s before setting up transport. > * Your recent arguing is about apparently hanging spamc processes, which > can only happen with stalled STDIN. No, we tried it even with input (see above), and it still hanged. > * Your patch does nothing in this regards. You might start with reading it. > Kip, can you coherently and in a single statement (unlike the squirming in > the previous 70+ comments) explain the issue again, please? It wouldn't matter what I said, besides the fact that I've already met this request, you're going to continue to troll and not listen anyways. The problem has been patched now. If you don't want to use it to improve your code base, that's fine. We can patch it downstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
