https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6939
--- Comment #83 from Kip <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Karsten Bräckelmann from comment #82) > I am sorry. I don't speak French. Poor me learned Latin in school...But > since you seem to have an interest in getting $(whatever your issue is) > fixed upstream, maybe you can lower yourself and explain it in a poor > English style I might be able to grasp? It's ok, the Latin will help break the language barrier: It's been provided already, ad nauseum. > Did you ever read at least the man-pages? (Beware, rhetorical question.) In that case, asking me whether spamc should check the validity of the TCP connection is a rhetorical question. My OP has nothing to do with TCP connections in any case. > I never called you a liar. Explicitly. Maybe implicitly, granted, but then > again my question stands -- which comment are you referring to? If I gave you a comment number (again), you'd denounce it at worst, or simply keep pushing the goal posts at best. I'm not your bibtex. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
