https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6939
--- Comment #81 from Kip <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Karsten Bräckelmann from comment #80) > So you say, the calling program should never have passed an empty string as > a value to an argument that requires a file? No, that's not what I said. Like I said, there's apparently a language barrier. > Not the same as verify arguments' contents. I don't think you understand how GNU getopt_long processing works. That's exactly one of the things it is suppose to do, verify arguments. Otherwise there would be no reason to set the required_argument bit set. > And do FS check to test the > argument exists, is a socket, and the apparent listener seems to be a spamd > instance. Correct. > Neither for TCP. So what? Test if the TCP host / port are valid as well? That's a good idea. Go for it. > > No, we tried it even with input (see above), and it still hanged. > > False. > > If you strongly believe I am wrong, please tell us at least the comment > number rather than "above" only. I already did and your solution was to call me a liar. > > you're going to continue to troll > > I won't. You are. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
