On 2015-07-21 21:10, Joe Quinn wrote:
On 7/21/2015 1:58 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 2015-07-21 12:00, [email protected] wrote:
SpamAssassin version 3.3.0 has not had a rule update since
2015-07-18.
SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 has not had a rule update since
2015-07-18.
SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 has not had a rule update since
2015-07-18.
20150720: Spam and ham are above threshold of 150,000:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20150720
20150720: Spam: 506817, Ham: 186493
The spam and ham counts on which this script alerts are from
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20150720
Click "(source details)" (it's tiny and low contrast).
It's from the second and third columns of the line that ends with
"(all messages)"
The source to this script is
http://www.chaosreigns.com/sa/update-version-mon.pl
Ok.
1) What does it mean that they are "too old"? Does it somehow affect
something?
2) What can we do about it? Do we have to do something for it?
The purpose of this mail is somewhat unclear to me. Yes, I am a
developer, but not a dev of SA. So I have to ask..
Bear with me, if this is stoopid.
br. jarif
This email tells the developers the current state of RuleQA, the AI
that automates the score assignments and publication of a subset of
the SA rules. It means the scores of some rules won't be perfectly
reflective of the current state of email (though it's only been a few
days so that's not really an issue).
The information is meant for the people who have access to the server
that RuleQA runs on, so don't worry about not understanding it.
Ok, thanks. I had to ask, as I am deploying daily the results to ruleqa
from my corpus, and wondered why it is "too old" while still over the
thresholds.
I will leave it at that.
be. jarif
