https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7610
John Hardin <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from John Hardin <[email protected]> --- (In reply to jidanni from comment #0) > It is just plain wrong to say > 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid > even if the score is 0, just because the > optional Mail::DKIM Perl module is not installed. > > http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/I-m-getting-T-DKIM-INVALID-from- > gmail-tp109464p109488.html : > > "DKIM_INVALID will hit on any DKIM signed message, if the > optional Mail::DKIM Perl module is not installed." Perhaps an "if can(something)" can be put around that rule definition to pick which message to display based on whether the module is installed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
