https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7610

Henrik Krohns <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #7 from Henrik Krohns <[email protected]> ---
If it's useful rule, why not simply move to rules/25_dkim.cf where it logically
belongs, instead of entertaining some strange sandbox meta rule?

There already exists everything needed for it:

full     DKIM_SIGNED            eval:check_dkim_signed()
full     DKIM_VALID             eval:check_dkim_valid()

Would this not work?

meta  DKIM_INVALID   DKIM_SIGNED && !DKIM_VALID

I guess it needs some score too.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to