WLBL code currently committed in trunk seems fully functional to me and I 
cannot spot any issues.
I am currently running trunk r1900387 on a server and r1899446 on all other 
servers.
Just updated to rc1 most servers without issues so far.
kb@ told me that he has better code for "plaintext_body_sig_ratio" but I did 
not saw his code yet.

 Giovanni

On 4/30/22 18:03, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Well it was out fault for working on diffs and not giving visibility.  Others 
> then did work on some of the same bugs in a new branch.
> 
> We are reconciling it against the same work others did on the WLBL, for 
> example.  And I expect with RC1 to find some pretty massive issues there 
> since I don't think anybody is using all the code there.
> 
> We also found some issues with sigonly in the original version and in other 
> patches too.  
> 
> So we're working on bugs and reconciliation between two different people's 
> code fixing the same bugs. Not easy.
> 
> Hope that clears things up and why I don't think RTC is useful for RC1 
> because I don't think it has any chance of becoming a full release.
> 
> Regards, KAM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2022, 10:58 Henrik K <h...@hege.li <mailto:h...@hege.li>> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
>     Wtf?  If you or someone have "giant diffs" or work being done, then post
>     them on the appropriate bugs, reopening if necessary.  I don't understand
>     why even waste time posting something vague like this.
> 
>     On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 09:50:15AM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>     > Should we delay RTC? I know there are some bugs being worked on in some 
> of the
>     > bugs that have been closed. I also know there's some patches that 
> Giovanni
>     > might or might not have gotten to for the WLBL. We had a giant diff for 
> that
>     > was collided.
>     >
>     > On Sat, Apr 30, 2022, 05:55 Axb <[1]axb.li...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:axb.li...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Doh! Henrik already did it.
>     >     Thanks!
>     >
>     >     On 4/30/22 11:52, Axb wrote:
>     >     > Should we update [2]20_aux_tlds.cf <http://20_aux_tlds.cf> for 
> this relesase?
>     >     >
>     >     > I can't do it at the moment - any taker?
>     >     >
>     >     > On 4/30/22 11:27, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
>     >     >> It's time for a code freeze in preparation for the release of 
> 4.0.0
>     >     >> release candidates.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Please do not commit anything to trunk other than the usual 
> ongoing
>     >     >> rules stuff that finds its way into the rule update process.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Any new bug fixes that need to be committed for 4.0.0 should be
>     >     >> associated with a bug opened with a 4.0 milestone and get 
> reviewed
>     >     >> before committed.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Please hold off on committing for any issue that is not marked 
> as 4.0
>     >     >> milestone.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Thanks,
>     >     >>
>     >     >>   Sidney
>     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > References:
>     >
>     > [1] mailto:axb.li...@gmail.com <mailto:axb.li...@gmail.com>
>     > [2] http://20_aux_tlds.cf/ <http://20_aux_tlds.cf/>
> 

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to