On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 03:15:37PM +0200, giova...@paclan.it wrote: > actually it could (and can) work with any DBI provider, documentation should > have been definitely improved.
That's of course assuming that the SQL is so basic that it will work with anything. Then again the module works just fine even without caching, I've seen like two short urls today on my mail feed. Maybe went for a bit overkill on the database support side.. I'll see if I can back it down a bit today. For future it would probably be better to have some common caching layer that modules could utilize and communicate cross-process.