On 5/2/22 15:28, Henrik K wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 03:15:37PM +0200, giova...@paclan.it wrote: >> actually it could (and can) work with any DBI provider, documentation should >> have been definitely improved. > > That's of course assuming that the SQL is so basic that it will work with > anything. > > Then again the module works just fine even without caching, I've seen like > two short urls today on my mail feed. I saw few thousands today, this is why I need a working cache layer.
> Maybe went for a bit overkill on the > database support side.. I'll see if I can back it down a bit today. > > For future it would probably be better to have some common caching layer > that modules could utilize and communicate cross-process. > a general caching layer would help a lot and simplify some code but let's concentrate on release now, this should be meat for the future. Giovanni
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
