On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 03:45:30PM +0200, giova...@paclan.it wrote: > On 5/2/22 15:28, Henrik K wrote: > > On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 03:15:37PM +0200, giova...@paclan.it wrote: > >> actually it could (and can) work with any DBI provider, documentation > >> should have been definitely improved. > > > > That's of course assuming that the SQL is so basic that it will work with > > anything. > > > > Then again the module works just fine even without caching, I've seen like > > two short urls today on my mail feed. > I saw few thousands today, this is why I need a working cache layer.
Let me know if you spot anything from my last updates. I don't understand what the point of "modified" col even is, proper name for it would have been "last_seen". Also "hits" has really no function at all, you could always parse stuff from logs, which don't get cleaned from TTL..
