https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7992
--- Comment #7 from Henrik Krohns <apa...@hege.li> --- (In reply to Michael Storz from comment #6) > I think the settag command is easier to understand for the user because it > is so similar to the header and body commands. But how would it even work? How does settag know if user wants to capture from header, body, rawbody, full or uri? Would you want to pollute namespace further with settag_body commands or strange tflags? For me the named capture is so far much cleaner and plugs directly into existing Check.pm rule logic. Priority/dependency problems remain. > However, if you want to go > the capture group direction, then at least use it to set a tag and do not > invent a new kind of variable Did you even read my list message where I'm suggesting that variables and tags should probably be one and the same thing? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
