I don't agree the first two are blockers for reasons I gave earlier.
Those two do look like important issues - are they regressions from 3.0.1?
I do agree we'd probably cut a new RC for those in any event, so agree with
the plan to drop 3.1.0 (if the Maven release can't be overwritten)

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 9:38 PM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>

> Before we discover the pre-uploaded artifacts, both Jungtaek and Hyukjin
> already made two blockers shared here.
> IIUC, it meant implicitly RC1 failure at that time.
> In addition to that, there are two correctness issues. So, I made up my
> mind to cast -1 for this RC1 before joining this thread.
> SPARK-34011 ALTER TABLE .. RENAME TO PARTITION doesn't refresh cache
> (committed after tagging)
> SPARK-34027 ALTER TABLE .. RECOVER PARTITIONS doesn't refresh cache (PR is
> under review)
> Although the above issues are not regression, those are enough for me to
> give -1 for 3.1.0 RC1.
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 3:52 PM Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I just don't see a reason to believe there's a rush? just test it as
>> normal? I did, you can too, etc.
>> Or specifically what blocks the current RC?

Reply via email to