+1 On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 10:16 AM bo yang <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 9:33 AM karuppayya <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 9:26 AM Cheng Pan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> A very promising proposal. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Cheng Pan >>> >>> >>> >>> On Dec 18, 2025, at 00:52, Nan Zhu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> thank you everyone and give my own +1 >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 8:43 AM Qiegang Long <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 non binding >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 11:38 AM Chao Sun <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Spark devs, >>>>> >>>>> I would like to start a vote on the SPIP: Burst-aware memoryOverhead >>>>> allocation algorithm for Spark@K8S >>>>> >>>>> Discussion thread: >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/85xob6ldnf9jpk7l8x64lknh4xff89sc >>>>> SPIP: >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v5PQel1ygVayBFS8rdtzIH8l1el6H1TDjULD3EyBeIc >>>>> JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-54596 >>>>> >>>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because >>>>> >>>> >>>
