+1 (binding) On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 5:10 AM Mridul Muralidharan <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > In our ecosystem (where memory gets progressively sized towards optimal > via automatic history based right sizing ) we found this does not work > well … and can cause incidents where nontrivial number of random pods start > failing when there is memory pressure on nodes :( > > But given this is flag guarded/opt-in, it will definitely benefits some > class of apps/deployments. > > Regards, > Mridul > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 12:53 AM Gengliang Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 10:16 AM bo yang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 9:33 AM karuppayya <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 9:26 AM Cheng Pan <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> A very promising proposal. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Cheng Pan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Dec 18, 2025, at 00:52, Nan Zhu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> thank you everyone and give my own +1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 8:43 AM Qiegang Long <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 non binding >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 11:38 AM Chao Sun <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Spark devs, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would like to start a vote on the SPIP: Burst-aware >>>>>>> memoryOverhead allocation algorithm for Spark@K8S >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Discussion thread: >>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/85xob6ldnf9jpk7l8x64lknh4xff89sc >>>>>>> SPIP: >>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v5PQel1ygVayBFS8rdtzIH8l1el6H1TDjULD3EyBeIc >>>>>>> JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-54596 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>
