+1 2025年12月18日(木) 15:02 Xiao Li <[email protected]>:
> +1 > > Kent Yao <[email protected]> 于2025年12月17日周三 21:03写道： > >> +1 (binding) >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Wenchen Fan <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Thursday, December 18, 2025 8:05 AM >> *To:* [email protected] <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Burst-aware memoryOverhead allocation >> algorithm for Spark@K8S >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 5:10 AM Mridul Muralidharan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> In our ecosystem (where memory gets progressively sized towards optimal >> via automatic history based right sizing ) we found this does not work >> well … and can cause incidents where nontrivial number of random pods start >> failing when there is memory pressure on nodes :( >> >> But given this is flag guarded/opt-in, it will definitely benefits some >> class of apps/deployments. >> >> Regards, >> Mridul >> >> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 12:53 AM Gengliang Wang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 10:16 AM bo yang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 9:33 AM karuppayya <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 9:26 AM Cheng Pan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> A very promising proposal. >> >> Thanks, >> Cheng Pan >> >> >> >> On Dec 18, 2025, at 00:52, Nan Zhu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> thank you everyone and give my own +1 >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 8:43 AM Qiegang Long <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 non binding >> >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 11:38 AM Chao Sun <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Spark devs, >> >> I would like to start a vote on the SPIP: Burst-aware memoryOverhead >> allocation algorithm for Spark@K8S >> >> Discussion thread: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/85xob6ldnf9jpk7l8x64lknh4xff89sc >> SPIP: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v5PQel1ygVayBFS8rdtzIH8l1el6H1TDjULD3EyBeIc >> JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-54596 >> >> Please vote on the SPIP for the next 72 hours: >> >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because >> >> >>
