The discussion thread and design doc seem to only have two people discussing the topic, are we sure there aren't any other comments? I know of some folks who are chiming in on the similar Parquet proposal, and I was wondering if we should get alignment there before adding the type to Spark?
On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 8:35 AM Shrirang Mhalgi <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non binding) Thank you Uroš. > > Regards, > Shrirang. > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 6:24 AM Serge Rielau <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> >> On Aug 25, 2026, at 5:20 AM, Stefan Kandic via dev <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> + 1 >> >> *From: *Uroš Bojanić <[email protected]> >> *Date: *Tuesday, 25 August 2026 at 13:20 >> *To: *[email protected] <[email protected]> >> *Subject: *[VOTE] SPIP: Add the DECFLOAT data type >> >> Hi all, >> >> Discussion regarding DECFLOAT data type has settled, so I'm calling a >> vote on the SPIP "Add the DECFLOAT data type". The SPIP proposes to add a >> new Spark SQL data type: DECFLOAT (IEEE 754 decimal64 / decimal128), for >> base-10 floating-point decimals with per-value exponents. The SPIP document >> has been updated along the way to address the feedback raised in the doc & >> discussion thread. >> >> DISCUSS thread: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wyfnsj45s3cn95thrgw4oho74zbcc5vm >> Spark JIRA ID: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-58820 >> SPIP document: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qnLXm0ldHSwPSJs_Q5SzGyyTKMMEqeX5rm8Fh4rvV3E >> >> The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1: Accept the proposal as an official SPIP >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1: I don't think this is a good idea because... >> >> Thank you! >> >> Best, >> Uroš >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >>
