[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14288931#comment-14288931
]
Hudson commented on SQOOP-1988:
-------------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in Sqoop2-hadoop200 #715 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Sqoop2-hadoop200/715/])
SQOOP-1988: Sqoop2: isNull handling should be moved to
CSVIntermediateDataFormat (abe:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git&a=commit&h=d95e7537a313a02d86a963063e0313f9ed7c04d9)
*
connector/connector-sdk/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/matcher/TestNameMatcher.java
*
connector/connector-sdk/src/test/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/matcher/TestLocationMatcher.java
*
connector/connector-sdk/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/matcher/LocationMatcher.java
*
connector/connector-sdk/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/matcher/Matcher.java
*
connector/connector-sdk/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/connector/matcher/NameMatcher.java
> Sqoop2: isNull handling should be moved to CSVIntermediateDataFormat
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-1988
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1988
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Qian Xu
> Assignee: Qian Xu
> Fix For: 1.99.5
>
> Attachments: SQOOP-1988.3.patch, SQOOP-1988.patch
>
>
> The {{Matcher.getMatchingData}} method is expected to rearrange record fields
> according to the FROM and TO schema. Currently here is an extra step in the
> implementation, which will reset any {{null}} {{"NULL"}} {{"null"}}
> {{"'null'"}} or {{""}} field to null.
> As there is no comment or documentation about this, I guess it is some
> undocumented special handling. [Here is some
> discussion|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-1811?focusedCommentId=14270755&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14270755].
> I think this check should not belong here. I propose to remove it. As the
> method will be called very frequently, the code removal will have performance
> advance. Thanks [~jerrychenhf]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
