[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14877362#comment-14877362
]
Sqoop QA bot commented on SQOOP-2544:
-------------------------------------
Testing file
[SQOOP-2544.patch|https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12761310/SQOOP-2544.patch]
against branch sqoop2 took 0:54:07.860805.
{color:green}Overall:{color} +1 all checks pass
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Clean was successful
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch applied correctly
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch add/modify test case
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} License check passed
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch compiled
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} All unit tests passed (executed 1420 tests)
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Test coverage did not decreased
([report|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/1703/artifact/patch-process/cobertura_report.txt])
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} No new findbugs warnings
([report|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/1703/artifact/patch-process/findbugs_report.txt])
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} All integration tests passed (executed 86 tests)
Console output is available
[here|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/1703/console].
This message is automatically generated.
> Sqoop2: Drop connectors servlet
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-2544
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2544
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> Assignee: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> Fix For: 1.99.7
>
> Attachments: SQOOP-2544.patch, SQOOP-2544.patch, SQOOP-2544.patch
>
>
> If I'm looking correctly, then we have two servlets - one called
> {{Connectors}} and second called {{Connector}} (plurality is the difference).
> Looking into the client code it seems that we're not really using
> {{Connectors}} form anywhere as it's a functionality equivalent for calling
> {{connector/all}}. Hence I would like to propose simply dropping it and have
> one public interface less to worry about. Any objections?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
