[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2544?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14907581#comment-14907581
]
Hudson commented on SQOOP-2544:
-------------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in Sqoop2 #905 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Sqoop2/905/])
SQOOP-2544. Sqoop2: Drop connectors servlet (hshreedharan:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git&a=commit&h=7e5075b2af2705e8a04ee94a769642aba6095a1f)
* server/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml
* server/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/server/v1/ConnectorsServlet.java
* server/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/handler/ConnectorRequestHandler.java
> Sqoop2: Drop connectors servlet
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-2544
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2544
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> Assignee: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> Fix For: 1.99.7
>
> Attachments: SQOOP-2544.patch, SQOOP-2544.patch, SQOOP-2544.patch,
> SQOOP-2544.patch
>
>
> If I'm looking correctly, then we have two servlets - one called
> {{Connectors}} and second called {{Connector}} (plurality is the difference).
> Looking into the client code it seems that we're not really using
> {{Connectors}} form anywhere as it's a functionality equivalent for calling
> {{connector/all}}. Hence I would like to propose simply dropping it and have
> one public interface less to worry about. Any objections?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)