On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Dileepa Jayakody > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Hi Reto, > > > > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > Hi Dileepa, > > > > > > I think this makes sense. Similar to self registered users (previous > > mail) > > > a user that comes with WebId or OpenId would get an account and be > > assigned > > > a Role (roaming-user role). Additionally to that there could be a > > mechanism > > > assigning permissions based on social-network distance. > > > > > > A first step might be to add an optional URI field in the user manager, > > > this URI would be the WebID/OpenID the user can use as an optional > log-in > > > mechanism. > > > > > > +1, this will be a good improvement in the user management module. > > Can you please elaborate more regarding the 'mechanism to assign > > permissions based on social-network distance'? > > I think we can calculate the social-network distance via WebID, but not > > sure if it can be done with OpenID. Would like to know more about your > > idea.It > > > It's sure easier with WebID. But as foaf contains a property to point to > the OpenID (http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_openid) it should also be > possible for OpenID. It would require crawling the social network of the > isntance owner to a certain distance and see if the person loging in is > part of it or not. > > Great, thanks for the pointer Reto. > Cheers, > reto > > Thanks, > > Dileepa > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Reto > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Dileepa Jayakody < > > > [email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Reto et al, > > > > > > > > I also, took a look at the user-management feature on the felix > > console. > > > > Looks cool. > > > > I think it can be further improved by integrating OpenID/WebID so > that > > > even > > > > users who are not registered in the Stanbol system can benefit from > it > > > > (this is in addition to the WebID integration benefits discussed > > > previously > > > > :) ). > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Dileepa > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:09 AM, Michael Luggen < > > [email protected] > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > I did check out the usermanagement, looks quite nice, > > > > > > > > > > Is there also an web service interface to let self-register new > users > > > and > > > > > let them choose a password from a web application standpoint view? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for inputs, > > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 26.04.2013, at 09:25, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 26, 2013 4:04 AM, "Dileepa Jayakody" < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> 2. WebID based authentication and userstore :Why doesn't Stanbol > > > have > > > > a > > > > > >> user-management module at the moment ? I think a user-store is a > > > valid > > > > > >> requirement for any CMS. > > > > > > > > > > > > You find some initial Stanbol usermanagement on the felix Web > > > console. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Reto > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
