As I already wrote changes breaking backward compatibility must not be
added to trunk as the 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT versions has been out there for quite
a long time and it should be possible that the software be developed
against trunk to work with the next release.

Cheers,
Reto


On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Sergio Fernández <
sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at> wrote:

> -1
>
> Releasing a 1.0 version would mean from my point of view:
>
> * Well tested source base
> * Significance evolution regarding features and/or performance
> * An opportunity to break backwards compatibility (like the evolution
>   of FISE)
> * Documentation about the transition
> * Ability of doing binary releases (right now there is not even a
>   working WAR launcher, see STANBOL-1190)
>
> And the current trunk lacks many of these things... so I think it's a bit
> hasty to thing about 1.0.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> On 23/04/14 08:53, Reto Gmür wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The 1.0 trunk has been quite stable recently. In the fusepool [1] project
>> we have been using it successfully for a while. I think we could release
>> what we have.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Reto
>>
>>
>> 1. https://github.com/fusepool
>>
>>
> --
> Sergio Fernández
> Senior Researcher
> Knowledge and Media Technologies
> Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
> Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/3 | 5020 Salzburg, Austria
> T: +43 662 2288 318 | M: +43 660 2747 925
> sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at
> http://www.salzburgresearch.at
>

Reply via email to