On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Sergio Fernández <sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at> wrote: > -1 > > Releasing a 1.0 version would mean from my point of view: > > * Well tested source base > * Significance evolution regarding features and/or performance > * An opportunity to break backwards compatibility (like the evolution > of FISE) > * Documentation about the transition
The Idea was to make the 1.0.0 release compatible with the 0.12.* releases and move all non-backward compatible changes to 2.0.0 . This would e.g. mean that 1.0.0 still uses FISE as enhancement structure. Related to this discussions I have already created a 2.0.0 release in JIRA some time ago. > * Ability of doing binary releases (right now there is not even a > working WAR launcher, see STANBOL-1190) +1 .. having WAR support is essential > > And the current trunk lacks many of these things... so I think it's a bit > hasty to thing about 1.0. such as * (Re-)Adding CORS support to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT * create a JAR and WAR launcher that we can release as binary. If we follow this scheme for 1.0.0 we are not so far off a 1.0.0 release. As soon as the 0.12.1 release is done I will have some time to work towards 1.0.0. I think the first thing will be to care about STANBOL-1190. best Rupert -- | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 | A-5500 Bischofshofen | REDLINK.CO .......................................................................... | http://redlink.co/