> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:22 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x 
> regular expressions
> 
> Eric Lemings wrote:
> >  
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Eric Lemings 
> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:58 PM
> >> To: '[email protected]'
> >> Subject: RE: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x 
> >> regular expressions
> >>
> >>  
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:30 PM
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Subject: Re: [jira] Deleted: (STDCXX-33) Implement C++0x 
> >>> regular expressions
> >>>
> >>> Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>>> Could we move issues instead of deleting them?
> >>> Also, we're still discussing what the plan is WRT how these
> >>> components will be organized so these kinds of changes seem
> >>> premature. In fact, I'm not sure I see why any issues need
> >>> to be deleted or moved. Why can't the existing ones can be
> >>> changed?
> >> They are subtasks and subtasks can't be moved.  I tried.
> > 
> > Also, subtasks can't be broken down into smaller issues.  Some of
> > these issues will likely need to be subdivided into smaller chunks
> > of work.
> 
> As a courtesy to the rest of us working on the project it would
> be nice to let us know what restructuring changes you'd like to
> make, and wait for feedback before making them. Especially
> deleting issues should be brought up because doing so not only
> permanently removes them from the database but also breaks any
> links pointing to such issues.

Jira is pretty smart.  It allows you to relink such issues before
deleting issues so there are no broken links.

And the issues are still in the database.  I just moved them from
subtasks into individual issues.  Or you'd prefer to keep the
duplicate issues?

Brad.

Reply via email to